Keith Cozart commented on Group 1 and Group 6 Program Evaluation
Samantha Pickens commented on Group 6 and Group 2 Program Evaluation
Samantha Pickens commented on Group 6 and Group 2 Program Evaluation
Kate Bowers commented on Group 2 and Group 3 Program Evaluation
Sean Rodgers commented on Group 4 and Group 7 Program Evaluation
15 Minute Yoga Program Evaluation: Improving the Proposal
Katie Bowers, Keith Cozart, Samantha Pickens, and Sean Rodgers
Ball State University
EDAC 634 – The Adult as a Learner
29 March 2015
15 Minute Yoga Program Evaluation: Improving the Proposal
Introduction
After
designing our program, 15 Minute Yoga:
Three Steps to Better Adult Living, we asked two educators, Dr. Jerry Wilde
from Indiana University East and Danielle Steele from Earlham College, to
review and evaluate it. These educators
were provided with an evaluation form, a copy of our program design, and a link
to the group blog so that they could see the scope of the group project and
read the posted materials. We hoped to
reach participants on a spiritual level through the implementation of simple
yoga poses and meditation practices. An
evaluation of our program design will indicate if we would be
able to successfully show the importance of a balanced perspective of equality,
diversity, respect, judgment-free, and mindful lifestyle to our
participants. It will also give us the
critical feedback we need to improve our program and make it better for our
participants.
Professionals
Dr. Jerry Wilde is a Professor of Educational
Psychology at Indiana University East.
He has been in the position for 17 years and is in his first year as
Interim Dean for the School of Education.
Dr. Wilde has degrees in School Psychology (Ed. S.) and Educational
Psychology (Ph. D.) (Jerry Wilde, n.d.).
He has written numerous books on cognitive behavior therapy with
children and adolescents. In his
evaluation, Dr. Wilde said that he does not have much time for hobbies, but he
loves music. In his current role as Dean
of the School of Education, he has had the opportunity to develop new programs
for Indiana University East. He has been
working to develop a graduate certificate for both Early Childhood Education
and Online Teaching and Assessment (Dr. Jerry Wilde, personal communication,
March 25, 2015). We feel that his current position and credentials make him
qualified to evaluate the educational side of the program.
In the evaluation of our adult education program
design, Dr. Wilde focused on how the literature helped to strengthen the
reader’s knowledge of spiritual learning and related to the program. From an outside perspective with no prior
study of spiritual learning, the program investigations were confusing when
compared to our own program design proposal.
The suggestions that Dr. Wilde provided through the evaluation form were
concentrated on helping others to understand the connection between the program
design and spiritual learning. Dr. Wilde
asked, “What evidence could you provide that yoga has been beneficial to
participants in terms of spiritual learning?” (Dr. Jerry Wilde, personal
communication, March 25, 2015).
The second evaluation
was done by Danielle Steele. Ms. Steele
is the Assistant Director of Choral Activities at Earlham College. She has a bachelors and masters degree in
music. Ms. Steele has an extensive
background in music performance, specifically opera. In her recent career at Earlham college, she
has been a part of a gender identity project in collaboration with the
Indianapolis Spirit and Place Festival and is currently doing research on the
transition from one gender to another (transgender) and its effect on the
singing voice (Danielle Steele, n.d.).
One of Ms. Steele’s other roles at Earlham College is as a yoga
instructor of Ashtanga Yoga at the Earlham Wellness Center. We believe Ms.
Steele’s experience as yoga instructor makes her viewpoint crucial for program
improvement.
Danielle Steele
provided a very comprehensive and useful evaluation of the program
proposal. Ms. Steele noted that the
proposal was well developed for introducing yoga to people who would not
otherwise have exposure. She praised the
instructor responsibility descriptions; especially the questions for examining
their own teaching as well as making the space a judgment-free zone and
flexibility in class plan to promote an organic and spiritually-freeing
experience. She was especially fond of
more experienced students helping newer students; “Yes, yes, yes! This is the
ONLY way to a successful yoga program.
Inclusivity and community. Brava
tutti!” (Danielle Steele, personal communication, March 27, 2015). In addition to the great comments on the
program design, Danielle Steele had some suggestions for improvement. As a practicing yogi herself, she noted in
her evaluation that savasana is a
pose that is used to close a yoga practice and is not meditation. Meditation takes place before savasana and can last 10 – 30
minutes. She also noted that the
instructors with the qualifications we had listed were an unrealistic
expectation. An instructor should be
paid $50 per hour for their time. A more
realistic instructor for a community program like this would be a beginner
instructor under the mentorship of a more experienced instructor. One final thought was that a sustainable
practice be included in the proposal, or resources for students to continue
practice on their own (Danielle Steele, personal communication, March 27, 2015)
Reflection
We have many things to take into consideration from the suggestions
that Dr. Wilde and Ms. Steele provided. It should be noted, however, that Dr.
Wilde’s evaluation focused on how our previous assignments aligned with our
program design instead of solely on the adult education program design. While
this was still helpful, we think a more thorough investigation of our program
was needed. In order to make our program better we should find ways to measure
and assess how well of a spiritual learning connection is being established
with the participants, review other yoga program designs to better
understand yoga methodologies and sustainable practices, research instructor
compensation and qualifications for a beginner level class, have seasoned yoga
professionals continually assess and adjust the program’s practices, provide
participants with extra resources such as an instruction sheet with pictures of
poses so they can use it as a point of reference when they are practicing on
their own, and reduce the number of concepts we implement in the 3-day session
and encourage participants to return for regular classes if they want to learn
more.
Conclusion
Program evaluations are very valuable for the development of our adult
education program design. These evaluations helped expose the weaknesses, as
well as, show the strengths of our program. In addition, our evaluators gave us
facets to consider from both the education and yoga perspectives. These
suggestions are essential to the evolution and improvement of the program.
References
Danielle Steele. (n.d.) Retrieved March 26,
2015, from Earlham College website:
http://www.earlham.edu/profile/?id=12342&r=6852&disp=False.
Jerry Wilde. (n.d). Retrieved March 26, 2015, from Indiana
University East website:
http://www.iue.edu/people/bio/bio.php?bio=jwilde.
Project Evaluation
Form
Group 5- Spiritual Learning
EDAC 634- The Adult as a Learner
15 Minute Yoga- Three Attainable Steps to Better Adult
Living
**Please complete the below
information pertaining to the project design.
Jerry Wilde
|
|
Interim Dean, School of
Education, Indiana University East
I have been a professor of
educational psychology for 17 years at IU East. This is my first year in the role of
Interim Dean
|
|
My degrees are in school
psychology (Ed.S.) and Educational Psychology (Ph.D.). I have written numerous books on cognitive
behavior therapy with children and adolescents. I don’t have much time for hobbies but I
love music.
In this new position of dean I
have had the opportunity to develop new programs of study. I have helped develop a graduate
certificate in 1) Early Childhood Education and 2) Online Teaching and
Assessment. I have no direct
experience with spiritual learning other than what I encounter in everyday
life. 0
|
|
What did you like most about the program design?
Before we get to the program
design I wanted to say that it was a solid lit review to start with. That helped frame what was to follow.
The chart at the end of the
Program Descriptions was helpful to compare the similarities and differences
between the programs.
For what reason?
|
|
What areas do think need improvement?
There were lots of typos but
that’s a minor issue.
I
originally was curious why ESR was selected because it is a school of
religion and as the authors have noted, “spirituality
and religion differ” (Tisdell, 2003).
It was hard for me to follow the connections between ESR, SBS,
and the yoga program. That seemed
forced. The connections weren’t clear
to me other than in the very broadest terms.
I’m curious why there was a
monthly summary for only the month of February.
What evidence could you provide
that yoga has been beneficial to participants in terms of spiritual
learning? That should be included in
your project.
Take the chart that compared
ESR and SBS and add a third column containing your program.
For what reason?
Suggestions on how?
It might have been interesting
to look at a wider range of programs perhaps even other yoga programs. Then again that might be pointless because
of the overlap. My guess is you might
have done that and abandoned the idea.
|
Project Evaluation
Form
Group 5- Spiritual Learning
EDAC 634- The Adult as a Learner
15 Minute Yoga- Three Attainable Steps to Better Adult
Living
**Please complete the below
information pertaining to the project design.
|
||
Assistant Director of Choral
Activities, Earlham College, Richmond, IN
Yoga Instructor, Ashtanga Yoga,
Earlham Wellness Center
|
||
What did you like most about the program design?
Strengths include:
For what reason?
I enjoy that this program
provides a gateway for those people who would be otherwise unexposed to yoga.
Instructors are given fabulous
questions for examining their own teaching, motives and how they interact
with and help their students grow.
An emphasis on the need to set
aside dedicated time for the practice of not only yoga/stretching but
meditation in order to truly have the mental, emotional and spiritual
benefits of the yoga take place within the student.
An emphasis on a judgment-free
environment not just on the part of the instructor or in the classroom but
that the participant be free from their own judgment, as well.
A reminder to the teacher that
preparation/a class plan and the willingness to also jettison said plan is
equally necessary for a flexible, organic, spiritually-freeing classroom.
Experiences that rely not just
on aural learning but involve the five senses and creative ways for students
to experience yoga, making it far more accessible to people with different
skill sets, intelligences, learning styles and physical abilities.
A quote:
“Other experienced students
will be encouraged to aid in the development of newer students to not only
aid in student development, but also aid in developing a communal class
environment.”
Yes, yes, yes! This is the ONLY way to a
successful yoga program. Inclusivity and community. Bravi tutti!
“Class will be evaluated on a
regular basis to determine if changes are needed to better serve the
abilities and needs of the students, such as schedule changes or
incorporating additional classes taught at different levels.”
See my comments in the
following section re: evaluation of the class.
|
||
What areas do think need improvement?
For what reason?
Suggestions on how?
There is a factual errors: “Savasana”
is a pose traditionally used to close a yoga practice. It is not meditation.
It is translated from the Sanskrit as “corpse” pose, which implies,
therefore, that there is nothing more to do in the practice. Meditation should
take place before a student enters savasana, usually in a comfortably
seated position (if students can achieve full or half lotus pose, this is a
traditional meditation posture and can last in most practices from 10-30
minutes as an incorporated part of a yoga routine. Meditation on its own can
last minutes or hours).
A quote from the paper:
“There will be two regular time
instructors with at least a 200 hour certification, and two part time regular
instructors, one advanced instructor with at least a 500 hour certification
as well as certification in multiple specialized yoga style certifications,
as well as one instructor who is beginning certification. The level of
instruction will be suitable for beginners, with adaptations for intermediate
and advanced students and with no presumed knowledge of yoga expected from
the students.”
This strikes me as unrealistic.
If this course, which focuses on simplicity and accessibility, is to be
offered at places that do not already have a yoga program in place, finding
this many instructors with this level of training would be nearly impossible.
Financially, it is not feasible. One, possibly two, 200-hour certified
instructor(s) would be more than sufficient for the student load a program
like this is likely to attract. While most instructors have chosen to
specialize in one form of yoga or another (Ashtanga, Bikram, etc.), no
specialization would be needed to teach this intro to yoga – only a good
understanding of the fundamental poses, exercise physiology and a compassionate
heart with ample space for the learning speed of people who could be
intimidated, resistant, or physically unable to do the poses.
What would be more realistic in
terms of staffing is if the instructor were under the mentorship of an
advanced teacher at an established yoga studio where the instructor regularly
studied. It could be arranged that the mentor teacher could observe the
200-hr. instructor a number of times throughout the semester in order to
evaluate not only the instructor but the success of the program overall. The
fee paid to this person would need to be $50/hr. for their time. The fees for
less-experienced instructors could vary from a per-student amount given to
them or a set fee they are paid per class or semester-long course regardless
of number of participants.
Regarding the 3-day intro
session, it’s good, but it’s VERY little time to introduce so many concepts.
Also, are students then encouraged to return for regular classes after they
go through the introduction or are they expected to do it on their own?
If on their own: provide them
with an instruction sheet with pictures of poses so they can refer to it as
they build their own practice.
If they are to return for more
classes, this isn’t made clear in the paper.
|
Roles
Keith Cozart – Find Professionals for
Evaluation, Create and Distribute and Collect Evaluations
Kate Bowers – Write Introduction, APA format
Samantha Pickens – Evaluation Professional
Profiles and Backgrounds, Evaluation Summary
Sean Rodgers – Reflection and Conclusion
Group 5,
ReplyDeleteDanielle Steele's evaluation will be beneficial for you. Her suggestion to provide an instructional sheet to students with poses to learn on their own will be a great addition to your program. I look forward to seeing the final project demonstration! Great Job!
Group 5,
ReplyDeleteI think the fact that you provided your evaluators with an evaluation sheet is great. That is something I really did not think about until after mine was done. I also like the fact the Danielle Steele was able to provide very good feedback to incorporate into the yoga program. Good job!
Keith, Samantha, Kate and Sean,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very neat program evaluation! I really like your evaluation sheet! I would like the future students to borrow this evaluation sheet from you! :)
I like the suggestions from both evaluators! The first evaluator, Dr. Jerry Wilde, asked you a very important question: “What evidence could you provide that yoga has been beneficial to participants in terms of spiritual learning?”
This question indicates that it is not enough to just have the physical yoga; you also need to have the activities which can help learners make a connection between physical yoga and spiritual learning. This is consistent with the suggestion I gave you in terms of how to connect physical yoga to spiritual learning in your action plan.
I also like the following suggestions from Dr. Jerry Wilde:
Take the chart that compared ESR and SBS and add a third column containing your program.
It might have been interesting to look at a wider range of programs perhaps even other yoga programs.
The second instructor, Danielle Steele provided you very concrete and practical suggestions in terms of how to improve your program design, which will help the program become more applicable in practice. For example:
This strikes me as unrealistic. If this course, which focuses on simplicity and accessibility, is to be offered at places that do not already have a yoga program in place, finding this many instructors with this level of training would be nearly impossible. Financially, it is not feasible.
Regarding the 3-day intro session, it’s good, but it’s VERY little time to introduce so many concepts.
…provide them with an instruction sheet with pictures of poses so they can refer to it as they build their own practice.
I like the following actions you will take:
In order to make our program better we should find ways to measure and assess how well of a spiritual learning connection is being established with the participants, review other yoga program designs to better understand yoga methodologies and sustainable practices, research instructor compensation and qualifications for a beginner level class, have seasoned yoga professionals continually assess and adjust the program’s practices, provide participants with extra resources such as an instruction sheet with pictures of poses so they can use it as a point of reference when they are practicing on their own, and reduce the number of concepts we implement in the 3-day session and encourage participants to return for regular classes if they want to learn more.
Bo